An Informative Platform for Chartered Accountants(CA) and CA Students.

Just enter Your Email Address and get Updates directly to Your Inbox and Kindly Click the Email Subscription Confirmation Link sent in Your Mail.
Showing posts with label Circulars. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Circulars. Show all posts

Company Law Settlement Scheme, 2014

Thursday, August 21, 2014 Posted by Unknown , , No comments
General Circular No. 34/2014, F. No. 02/13/2014 CL-V, dated 12th August, 2014

As you are aware, the Companies Act requires companies to file annual documents (Annual return and financial Statements) on the MCA21 electronic registry, within prescribed time limits. Sections 92, 137 and 403 of the Companies Act, 2013, which correspond to sections 159, 220 and 611 of the Companies Act, 1956 may be referred to in this regard. These annual documents are considered very important in context of an up-to-date Registry, it is observed that a large percentage of companies have not filed their statutory documents making them liable for penalties and prosecution for such non-compliance.

2. The Companies Act, 2013 lays down a stricter regime for the defaulting companies with higher additional fees. The quantum of punishment has been enhanced under the above mentioned provisions of the Act vis-a-vis the earlier Act i.e. Companies Act, 1956. A specific provision for enhanced fine in case of repeated default also been included in the form of section 451 of the Act. Additionally, the provisions section 164(2) of the Act, inter alia, providing for disqualification of directors in case a company has not filed financial statements or annual returns for any continuous period of three financial years has been extended to all companies.

3. The Ministry has received representations from various stakeholders requesting for grant of transitional period/one-time opportunity to enable them to file their pending annual documents to avoid attraction of higher fees/fine and other penal action, especially disqualification of their Director prescribed under the new provisions of the Act.

4.  in order to give such an opportunity to the defaulting companies to enable them to make their default good by filing these belated documents, the Central Government in exercise of powers conferred under section 403 and 460 of the Companies Act, 2013 has decided to introduce a Scheme namely “Company Law Settlement Scheme 2014″ [CLSS-2014] condoning the delay in filing the above mentioned documents with the Registrar, granting immunity for prosecution and charging a reduced additional fee of 25% of the actual additional fees payable as per section 403 read with Companies (Registration Offices and Fee) Rules, 2014 for filing those belated documents under the Companies Act, 1956/2013 and the Rules made thereunder.

5.  In addition, the scheme gives an opportunity to Inactive companies to get their companies declared as ‘dormant company’ under section 455 of the Act (Chapter XXIX) by filing a simple application at reduced fees. The said provision enables Inactive companies to remain on the Register of Companies with minimal compliance requirements.

6. The details of the Scheme are as under:-

(i) The scheme shall come into force on the 15th August 2014 and shall remain in force up to 15th October, 2014.

(ii) Definitions –  In this Scheme, unless the context otherwise requires,

(a) “Act” means the Companies Act, 2013 and Companies Act, 1956 (where ever applicable);

(b) “Company” means a company as defined in clause of 20 of section 2 of the  Companies Act, 2013 ;

(c) “defaulting company” means a company defined under the Companies Act, 2013, and which has made a default in filing of annual statutory documents.

(d) “designated authority” means the Registrar of Companies having jurisdiction  over the registered office of the company.

(e) “immunity certificate” means the certificate referred to in sub-paragraph (vi) of the Scheme;

(f) “inactive Company” means as defined In Explanation (i) to sub-section (1) of  section 455(1) of Companies Act, 2013.

(iii) Applicability: - Any “defaulting company” Is permitted to file belated documents which were due for filing till 30th June 2014 In accordance with the provisions of this Scheme:

(iv)  Manner of payment of fees and additional fee on filing belated document for  seeking Immunity under the Scheme - The defaulting company shall pay statutory filing fees as prescribed under the Companies (Registration Offices and fee) Rules, 2014 along with additional fees of 25% of the actual additional fee payable on the date of filing of each belated document.

(v)  Withdrawal of appeal against prosecution launched for the offences: If the defaulting company has filed any appeal against any notice Issued or complaint filed before the competent court for violation of the provisions under the Companies Act,  1956  and/or Companies Act,  2013  in  respect of which application is made under this scheme, the applicant shall before filing an application for issue of Immunity certificate, withdraw the appeal and furnish proof of such withdrawal along with the application.

(vi)  Application for Issue of Immunity in respect of document(s) filed under the Scheme -  The application for seeking immunity in respect of belated documents filed under the Scheme may be made electronically in the e-Form CLSS-2014 annexed, after the document(s) are taken on file, or on record at approved by the Registrar of Companies as the case may be. The e-Form for filing application to obtain such a certificate will be available on the MCA21 portal from 1st September, 2014 and may be filed thereafter but not later than three months from the date of closure of the Scheme. There shall not be any fee payable on this Form.

Provided that this immunity shall not be applicable in the matter of any  appeal pending before the court of law and in case of management disputes of the company pending before the court of law or tribunal.

(vii)  Order by designated authority granting immunity from penalty and prosecution - The designated authority shall consider the application and upon being satisfied shall grant the immunity certificate in respect of documents filed under this Scheme.

(viii)  Scheme not to apply in certain cases – (a) This scheme shall not apply to the filing of belated documents other than the following:

a. Form 20B -  Form for filing annual return by a company having share capital.

b. Form 21A - Particulars of Annual return for the company not having share capital.

c. Form 23AC, 23ACA, 23AC-XBRL and 23ACA-XBRL -   Forms for filing Balance Sheet and Profit & Loss account.

d. Form 66 – Form for submission of Compliance Certificate with the Registrar.

e.  Form 238 -  Form for Intimation for Appointment of Auditors.

(ix) This Scheme shall not apply

a. to companies against which action for striking off the name under sub- section (5) of section 560 of Companies Act, 1956 has already been initiated  by the Registrar of Companies or

b. where any application has already been filed by the companies for action of  striking off name from the Register of Companies or

c.  where applications have been filed for obtaining Dormant Status under  section 455 of the Companies Act, 2013;

d. to vanishing companies

(x)  After granting the immunity, the Registrar concerned shall withdraw the prosecution(s) pending if any before the concerned Court(s);

(xi) Scheme for Inactive Companies: The defaulting inactive companies, while filing due documents under CLSS-2014 can, simultaneously, either:

a. apply to get themselves declared as Dormant Company under section 455 of  the Companies Act, 2013 by filing e-form MSC-1 at 25% of the fee for the  said form; OR

b. apply for striking off the name of the company by filing e- Form FTE at 25% of the fee payable on form FTE.

(xii)  Applicability of clause (a) sub-section (2) of Companies Act, 2013 In case of companies availing the Scheme:- In case of defaulting companies which avail of this Scheme and file all belated documents, the provisions of clause (a) of subsection (2) of section 164 of the Companies Act, 2013 shall apply only for the prospective defaults, if any, by such companies.

7.  At the conclusion of the Scheme, the Registrar shall take necessary action under the Companies Act, 1956/ 2013 against the companies who have not availed this Scheme and are in default in filing these documents in a timely manner.
.
.
.

SEBI Circular on expanding the framework of OFS of Shares through Stock Exchange Mechanism

Expanding the framework of Offer for Sale (OFS) of Shares through Stock Exchange Mechanism

Circular, CIR/MRD/DP/24/201, dated 08th August, 2014

1. Comprehensive guidelines on sale of shares through Offer for Sale mechanism were issued vide circular no CIR/MRD/DP/18/2012 dated July 18, 2012. These guidelines have been modified vide circulars dated CIR/MRD/DP/04/2013 dated January 25, 2013 and CIR/MRD/DP/17/2013 dated May 30, 2013.

2. While the OFS mechanism has been successfully used to divest promoter stake, market feedback indicated that there is a need to take measures to encourage retail participation in OFS, enable other large shareholders to use the OFS mechanism and expand the universe of companies to use this framework.

3. Accordingly, the OFS framework shall be modified as under.

3.1. The OFS mechanism shall be available to top 200 companies by market capitalization in any of the last four completed quarters.

3.2. Any non-promoter shareholder of eligible companies holding at least 10% of share capital may also offer shares through the OFS mechanism.

3.3. In case a non-promoter shareholder offers shares through the OFS mechanism, promoters/ promoter group entities of such companies may participate in the OFS to purchase shares subject to compliance with applicable provisions of SEBI (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2009 and SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 2011.

3.4. Minimum 10% of the offer size shall be reserved for retail investors. For this purpose, retail investor shall mean an individual investor who places bids for shares of total value of not more than Rs.2 lakhs aggregated across the exchanges. If the cumulative bid value across exchanges exceeds Rs.2 lakhs in the retail category, such bids shall be rejected.

3.5. Individual retail investors shall have the option to bid in the retail category and the general category. However, if the cumulative bid value of such investors exceeds Rs.2 lakhs, the bids in the retail category shall become ineligible.

3.6. The cut off price i.e. the lowest price at which the entire offer gets sold, shall be determined based on all valid bids. The cut off price shall be determined separately for bids received in the retail category and for bids received in the non-retail category.

3.7. Upon determining the cut-off price, the offer size reserved for retail investors shall be allocated to eligible bids of retail investors. Any unutilized portion shall be offered to non-retail category of investors. In case of excess demand in retail category at the cut-off price, allocation shall be on proportionate basis.

3.8. Indicative price for retail and non-retail portion shall be displayed separately.

3.9. Seller shall announce intention of sale of shares latest by 5 pm on T-2 day (T day being the day of the OFS) to the stock exchange. Stock exchanges shall inform the market immediately upon receipt of notice.

3.10. In case of disclosure of the floor price, seller shall disclose the floor price latest by 5 pm on T-1 day to the stock exchange. Stock exchanges shall ensure that the same is informed to the market immediately.

3.11. Seller may offer discount to retail investors. The details of discount and percentage of reservation for retail investors shall be disclosed upfront in the notice of OFS to the exchange.

3.12. Discount to retail investors may be offered as follows:

Multiple Clearing price OFS-

3.12.1. Retail investors may be allocated shares at a discount to the cut-off price determined in the retail category, irrespective of the bid price entered by them. Or

3.12.2. Retail investors may be allocated shares at a discount to the bid price entered by them.

Single clearing price OFS-

3.12.3. Retail investors shall be allocated shares at a discount to cut off price determined in the retail category.

3.13. In case of both of the above methodologies, the discounted price which shall be the final allocation price to the retail investors may be below the floor price.

4. Para 1, 2, 5 and para 7 of OFS circular dated July 18, 2012 stand accordingly modified. All other conditions for sale of shares through OFS framework contained in the circulars CIR/MRD/DP/18/2012 dated July 18, 2012, CIR/MRD/DP/04/2013 dated January 25, 2013 and CIR/MRD/DP/17/2013 dated May 30, 2013 remain unchanged.

5. Stock Exchanges are advised to:

5.1. take necessary steps and put in place necessary systems for implementation of above within three weeks from the date of this circular.

5.2. take steps to implement para 3.9 and 3.10 above with immediate effect.

5.3. make necessary amendments to the relevant bye-laws, rules and regulations for the implementation of the above decision.

5.4. bring the provisions of this circular to the notice of the member brokers of the stock exchange to also to disseminate the same on their website.

6. This circular is being issued in exercise of powers conferred under Section 11 (1) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 to protect the interests of investors in securities and to promote the development of, and to regulate the securities market.
.
.
.

MCA Clarification w.r.t applicability of provisions of Section 139(5) and 139(7) of the Companies Act, 2013

General Circular No. 33/2014, F. No.1/33/13-CL-V, dated 3lst July, 2014

Clarification with regard to applicability of provisions of Section 139(5) and 139(7) of the Companies Act, 2013

Doubts have been raised about applicability of Sections 139(5) and 139(7) of the Companies Act, 2013 (New Act), which deal with appointment of auditors by Comptroller and Auditor General of India (C&AG), to 'deemed Government Companies' referred to in section 619B of the Companies Act 1956 (Old Act) i.e. companies where ownership or control lies with two or more Government companies or corporations etc in the manner detailed in section 619B ibid, Stakeholders have pointed out that the New Act does not contain specific provisions about 'deemed Government companies' on the lines of section 619B of the Old Act. Clarification has been sought whether, under the new Act, such deemed Government companies would be subject to audit by the C&AG in the same manner as Government Companies.

2. The above issue has been examined and it is clarified that the new Act does not alter the position with regard to audit of such deemed Government companies through C&AG and thus such companies are covered under sub- section (5) and (7) of Section 139 of the New Act.

3. Further, it has also been observed that the words “any other company owned or controlled, directly or indirectly .......... by the Central Government and partly by one or more State Governments” appearing in sub-sections (5) and (7) of section 139 of the New Act are to be read with the definition of ‘control’ in section 2(27) of the New Act. Thus documents like articles of association and shareholders agreements etc envisaging control under section 2(27) are to be taken into account while deciding whether an individual company, other than those referred in paragraph 1-2 above, is covered under section 139(5)/139(7) of the New Act.

4. Clarification has also been sought about the manner in which the information about incorporation of a company subject to audit by an auditor to be appointed by the C&AG is to be communicated to the C&AG for the purpose of appointment of first auditors under section 139(7) of the New Act. It is hereby clarified that such responsibility rests with both, the Government concerned and the relevant company. To avoid any confusion it is further clarified that it will primarily be the responsibility of the company concerned to intimate to the C&AG about its incorporation along with name, location of registered office, capital structure of such a company immediately on its incorporation, It is also incumbent on such a company to share such intimation to the relevant Government so that such Government may also send a suitable request to the C&AG.

5. This issues with the approval of the competent authority.
.
.
.

Monitoring of Compliance by Stock Exchanges

Circular, CIR/CFD/DIL/4/2014, dated 01st August, 2014

Monitoring of Compliance by Stock Exchanges

1. SEBI, vide Circular No. CIR / MRD / DSA / 31 /2013 dated September 30, 2013 and Circular No. CIR / CFD / POLICYCELL / 13 / 2013 dated November 18, 2013 advised stock exchanges to, inter-alia, put in place a system to monitor and review the compliance of listing conditions by listed companies. Clause 5.2 of the Circular dated November 18, 2013 also advised stock exchanges to devise framework to detect any non-compliance / violation of the applicable laws.

2. SEBI vide circular dated April 17, 2014 has also made certain amendments to the Clause 49 of the Listing Agreement. The amended Clause 49, inter-alia, provides for Principles of Corporate Governance to be mandatorily complied with by listed companies.

3. The Principles of Corporate Governance, inter-alia, provide that shareholders should have opportunity to participate effectively and vote in general shareholder meetings. These principles also require companies to facilitate effective shareholder participation and exercise of ownership rights and require that company procedures shall not make it unduly difficult or expensive to cast votes.

4. In this regard, it is observed that some listed companies belonging to a common group have held their AGMs, with a time gap of 15 minutes between two AGMs. It is also observed that these companies were formed out of demergers and had 80% common shareholding thereby leaving only 15 minutes each for the common shareholders to attend the AGM of these companies.

5. It is observed that allocation of 15 minutes for conducting AGM of a public listed company having more than one lakh shareholders does not appear to be adequate enough to facilitate a constructive discussion on various matters transacted at the AGM. Such a practice affects the rights of investors to seek clarifications/hold discussions and prima-facie appears to be prejudicial to the interest of the investors.

6. In view of the above, Clause 5.2 of the Circular dated November 18, 2013 and the provisions of the revised Clause 49 which are scheduled to take effect from October 01, 2014, all recognised stock exchanges are advised to step up and equip their monitoring framework to identify and monitor such practices and to ensure that requirements laid down by Principles of Corporate Governance in the revised Clause 49 of the Listing Agreement are followed in letter and spirit.

7. This circular is issued in exercise of the powers conferred under Section 11 read with Section 11A of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992.

8. Stock Exchanges are advised to ensure compliance with this circular.

9. This circular is available on SEBI website at www.sebi.gov.in under the categories “Legal Framework” and “Issues and Listing”.
.
.
.

Clarification regarding taxation of ‘Alternate Investment Funds’ having status of Non-Charitable Trusts

Friday, August 08, 2014 Posted by Unknown , , , No comments
Circular No. 13/2014, F.No.225/78/2014-ITA.II, dated 28th July, 2014

Clarification regarding taxation of ‘Alternate Investment Funds’ having status of Non-Charitable Trusts under the Income Tax Act, 1961 – regarding.

1. The SEBI (Alterative Investment Funds) Regulations, 2012 (‘AIF Regulations’) vide Regulation No.4 issued in May 2012 aims at regulating all forms of private pool of funds in India. The said Regulations divide the Alternative Investment Funds (‘AIFs’) into three broad categories – Category-I, Category-II and Category-III Alternative Investment Funds, depending upon the operational strategies, objectives and fund structure. A large number of AIFs registered with SEBI have been set up in the form of non-charitable trusts.

2. While the AIFs, being Venture Capital Funds, making investment in the Venture ‘Capital Undertakings have been accorded ‘tax pass through’ status under section 10(23FB) read with section 115U of the Income tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’) (whereby income arising in the hands of such Fund would be treated as tax-exempt, while investors of such funds would become liable to tax liability on as if the investors have made the investments directly in the Venture Capital Undertaking), clarification has been sought about tax-treatment in cases of AIFs being non-charitable trusts where the investors name and beneficial interest are not explicitly known on the date of its creation – such information becoming available only when the funds starts accepting contributions from the investors.

3. Board has been requested to clarify whether the income of such funds would be taxable in the hands of the Trustees of the AIF in the capacity of a ‘Representative Assessee’ (as defined u/s- 160(i)(iv) of the Act) or in the hands of investors (i.e. contributors of funds).

4. The matter has been examined. In the situation where the trust deed either does not name the investors or does not specify their beneficial interests, provisions of sub-section (1) of section 164 would) come into play and the entire income of the Fund shall become liable to be taxed at the Maximum Marginal Rate of income-tax in the hands of the trustees of such AIFs in their capacity as ‘Representative Assessee’. It is also clarified that in such cases, provisions of section 166 of the Act need not be invoked in the hands of the investor, as corresponding income has already been taxed in the hands of the ‘Representative Assessee’ in accordance with sub-section (1) of section 164 of the Act.

5. However, in cases of funds where names of the beneficiaries and their interests in the Fund are determined i.e. stated in the trust deed, the tax on whole of the income of the Fund – consisting of or including profits and gains of business, would be leviable upon the Trustees of such AIF, being ‘Representative Assessee’ at the Maximum Marginal Rate in accordance with sub-section (1A) of section 161 of the Act.

6. The clarification given above shall not be operative in the area falling in the jurisdiction of a High Court which has taken or takes a contrary decision on the issue.

7. The contents of this Circular may be brought to the notice of all concerned.

8. Hindi version to follow.

Clarification on position limits of domestic institutional investors for currency derivatives contracts

Circular, CIR/MRD/DP/23/2014, dated 24th July, 2014

Clarification on position limits of domestic institutional investors for currency derivatives contracts

SEBI vide circular no. CIR/MRD/DP/20/2014 dated June 20, 2014 had revised position limits for the market participants in the permitted currency pairs.

2. In this regard, it is clarified that domestic institutional investors shall have position limits as mentioned at para 12.(a) of the SEBI circular CIR/MRD/DP/20/2014 dated June 20, 2014, subject to such domestic institutional investors being permitted by their respective sectoral regulators to participate in the currency derivatives segment.

3. It is further clarified that banks, whether participating in the currency derivatives segment as clients or as stock brokers, shall be guided by the provisions mentioned at para 3 of the RBI A.P. (DIR Series) Circular no. 147 dated June 20, 2014 while trading in the currency derivatives segment.

4. Stock Exchanges and Clearing Corporations are directed to:

(a) take necessary steps to put in place systems for implementation of the circular, including necessary amendments to the relevant bye-laws, rules and regulations.

(b) bring the provisions of this circular to the notice of the stock brokers / clearing members and also disseminate the same on their website;

(c) communicate to SEBI the status of implementation of the provisions of this circular.

5. This circular is being issued in exercise of powers conferred under Section 11 (1) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 to protect the interests of investors in securities and to promote the development of, and to regulate the securities market.
.
.
.

MCA Clarification on transitional period for resolutions passed under the Companies Act, 1956

General Circular No. 32/2014, No.1/25/ 13-CL-V, dated 23rd July, 2014.

Clarification on transitional period for resolutions passed under the Companies Act, 1956

It has been brought to the notice of the Government that many companies have passed resolutions during financial year 2013-14 under the relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 (Old Act) which are/were at different stages of implementation after coming into force of corresponding provisions of the new Companies Act, 2013 (New Act). Ministry has received suggestions that while section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 protects the validity of such resolutions, it will be advisable if a suitable communication is also issued in the matter by the Ministry by way of abundant caution.

2. The matter has been examined in the light of similar issues clarified earlier. It is clarified that resolutions approved or passed by companies under relevant applicable provisions of the Old Act during the period from 1st September, 2013 to 31st March, 2014, can be implemented, in accordance with provisions of the Old Act, notwithstanding the repeal of the relevant provision subject to the conditions (a) that the implementation of the resolution actually commenced before 1st April, 2014 and (b) that this transitional arrangement will be available upto expiry of one year from the passing of the resolution or six months from the commencement of the corresponding provision in New Act whichever is later. It is also clarified that any amendment of the resolution must be in accordance with the relevant provision of the New Act.

This issues with the approval of the competent authority.
.
.
.

Change in Government Debt Investment Limits

Circular, CIR/IMD/FIIC/ 17/2014, dated 23rd July, 2014

All Foreign Portfolio Investors
through their Designated Depository Participants

The Depositories (NSDL and CDSL)

1. Present debt investment limits available for FPI investments in Government securities (G-Secs) include a USD 20 billion limit for all FPIs and another USD 10 billion limit for Long Term FPIs. While the USD 20 billion limit has been fully utilized, the USD 10 billion limit has been utilized only up to 22.86%.

2. Therefore, in partial modification of para 5 of the SEBI circular CIR/IMD/FIIC/8/2014 dated April 07, 2014, it has been decided to enhance the investment limit in government securities available to all FPIs by USD 5 billion by correspondingly reducing the amount available to long term FPIs from USD 10 billion to USD 5 billion within the overall limit of USD 30 billion.

3. The incremental investment limit of USD 5 billion (INR 24,886 cr) shall be required to be invested in government bonds with a minimum residual maturity of three years. Further, all future investment against the limit vacated when the current investment by an FPI runs off either through sale or redemption shall also be required to be made in government bonds with a minimum residual maturity of three years. It is, however, clarified that there will be no lock-in period and FPIs shall be free to sell the securities (including those that are presently held with less than three years of residual maturity) to the domestic investors.

4. The Government debt investment limit shall now be as follows:
.
.
.

MCA – Regarding Extension of validity of Reserved Names

Tuesday, August 05, 2014 Posted by Unknown , , No comments
General Circular No. 31/2014, F. No. MCA21/152/2014-eGov Cell, dated 19th July, 2014

Extension of validity of reserved names – reg.

The Service Provider of MCA-21 has brought to the notice of the Ministry that the letters of intimation issued in respect of 9522 cases for reservation of names (INC-1) allow the applicants to use reserved names within 60 days of date of such intimation. This is at variance with the implementation in the MCA-21. This is causing inconvenience to the stakeholders.

In view of this, the validity of 1930 of the above mentioned 9522 cases for reservations of names which have expired as on the date of this circular is hereby extended upto 18th August, 2014. Further, in case of 6864 cases where names have been reserved and are yet to be used, the time period as indicated in the letters of intimations is allowed. All applicants may accordingly be advised to file relevant e-forms for incorporation of companies under the Companies Act, 2013 well before the validity period.

This issues with the approval of the competent authority.
.
.
.

Clarification and extension of deadline w.r.t circular on Guidelines on disclosures.......

Clarification and extension of deadline with respect to circular on Guidelines on disclosures, reporting and clarifications under AIF Regulations

Circular, CIR/IMD/DF/16/2014, dated July 18, 2014

All Alternative Investment Funds ("AIFs") registered with SEBI

SEBI had issued a circular No. CIR/IMD/DF/14/2014 dated June 19, 2014 on 'Guidelines on disclosures, reporting and clarifications under AIF Regulations'. In this regard, it is clarified as under:

1. The deadline for sending of annexure to the placement memorandum to the investors under clause 2(a)(iii) is extended till August 31, 2014.

2. With respect to disclosure of disciplinary history under clause 2(a)(ii), the same shall be applicable for the last 5 years and where monetary penalty is involved, in cases where such penalty is greater than Rs. 5 lakhs. With respect to disputed tax liabilities, the same shall not apply to liabilities in personal capacity of an individual. Contingent liabilities shall be as disclosed in books of accounts of the entity.

3. With respect to clause 2(b)(iii), the changes shall include modifications in terms or documents of the fund/scheme and the same may be intimated to investors and SEBI once every six months on a consolidated basis. With respect to clause 2(b)(iv), 'material' changes may be construed as changes in the fundamental attributes of the fund/scheme and the process for exit under the clause shall not apply in cases where the AIF has approval of not less than 75% of unit holders by value of their investment in the AIF with respect to sub-clauses (a) and (b).

4. With respect to clause 3(d), joint investors shall mean where each of the investor contributes towards the AIF. With respect to clause 3(g), such investee company shall hold or propose to hold not less than one project, directly or indirectly.
.
.
.

MCA Clarifications on matters relating to Related Party Transactions

General Circular No, 30/2014, No. 1/32/2013- CL-V (Pt), dated l7th July, 2014

Clarifications on matters relating to Related Party Transactions

Government has received representations from stakeholders seeking certain clarifications on related party transactions covered under section 188 of the Companies Act, 2013. These representations have been examined and the following clarifications are given:-

1. Scope of second proviso to Section 188(1):-

Second proviso to sub-section (1) of section 188 requires that no member of the company shall vote on a special resolution to approve the contract or arrangement (referred to in the first proviso), if such a member is a related patty. It is clarified that 'related party' referred to in the second proviso has to be construed with reference only to the contract or arrangement for which the said special resolution is being passed. Thus, the term 'related party' in the above context refers only to such related party as may be a related party in the context of the contract or arrangement for which the said special resolution is being passed.

2. Applicability of Section 188 to corporate restructuring- amalgamations etc.  : -

It is clarified that transactions arising out of Compromises, Arrangements and Amalgamations dealt with under specific provisions of the Companies Act, 1956/Companies Act, 2013, will not attract the requirements of section 188 of the Companies Act, 2013.

3. Requirement of fresh approvals for past contracts under Section 188. :-

Contracts entered into by companies, after making necessary compliances under Section 297 of the Companies Act, 1956, which already came into effect before the commencement of Section 188 of the Companies Act, 2013, will not require fresh approval under the said section 188 till the expiry of the original term of such contracts. Thus, if any modification in such contract is made on or after 1st April, 2014, the requirements under section 188 will have to be complied with.

4. This issues with approval of the competent authority.
.
.
.

Registration of names of the Companies shall be in consonance with.....

Friday, July 18, 2014 Posted by Unknown , , No comments
General Circular No.29/2014, File No.2/2/2014-CL-V, dated 11th July, 2014

Registration of names of the Companies shall be in consonance with the provisions of the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950 -reg.

In continuation of this Ministry's circular No. 02/2014 and 26/2014 dated 11.02.2014 and 27.06.2014 respectively, it is hereby directed that while allotting names to Companies/Limited Liability Partnerships, the Registrar of Companies concerned should exercise due care to ensure that the names are not in contravention of the provisions of the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950. To this end it is necessary that Registrars are fully familiar with the provisions of the said Act.

2. This issues with the approval of the competent authority.
.
.
.

Manner of distribution of common input service credit under rule 7(d) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004

Monday, July 14, 2014 Posted by Unknown , , No comments
Circular No. 178/4/2014-ST, F.No.334/15/2014-TRU, dated 11th July, 2014

Manner of distribution of common input service credit under rule 7(d) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 -- regarding.

Doubts have been raised regarding the manner and extent of the distribution of common input service credit in terms of amended rule 7 [especially rule 7(d)] of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 (CCR). Rule 7 provides for the mechanism of distribution of common input service credit by the Input Service Distributor to its manufacturing units or to units providing output services. An amendment was carried out vide Notification no. 05/2014-CE (N.T.) dated 24th February, 2014, amending inter-alia rule 7(d) providing for distribution of common input service credit among all units in their turnover ratio of the relevant period. Rule 7(d), after the amendment, reads as under:

credit of service tax attributable to service used by more than one unit shall be distributed pro rata on the basis of the turnover of such units during the relevant period to the total turnover of all its units, which are operational in the current year, during the said relevant period’

2. These doubts have arisen with respect to the meaning of the words ‘such unit’ used in rule 7(d). It has been stated in the representations that due to the use of the term ‘such unit’, the distribution of the credit would be restricted to only those units where the services are used. It has been interpreted by the trade that in view of the amended rule 7(d) of the CCR, the credit available for distribution would get reduced by the proportion of the turnover of those units where the services are not used.

3. Rule 7 was amended to simplify the method of distribution. Prior to this amendment there were a few issues raised by the trade regarding distribution of credit under rule 7 such as determining the turnover of each unit for each month and distributing by following the nexus of the input services with the units to which such services relate. The amendment in the said rule was carried out to address these issues. The amended rule 7(d) seeks to allow distribution of input service credit to all units in the ratio of their turnover of the previous year. To make the intent of the amended rule clear, illustration of the method of distribution to be followed is given below.

4. An Input Service Distributor (ISD) has a total of 4 units namely ‘A’, “B’, ‘C’ and ‘D’, which are operational in the current year. The credit of input service pertaining to more than one unit shall be distributed as follows:

Distribution to ‘A’ =

X
* Z

Y

X = Turnover of unit ‘A’ during the relevant period

Y = Total turnover of all its unit i.e. ‘A’+’B’+’C’+’D’ during the relevant period

Z = Total credit of service tax attributable to services used by more than one unit

Similarly the credit shall be distributed to the other units ‘B’, ‘C’ and ‘D’.

Illustration:

An ISD has a common input service credit of Rs. 12000 pertaining to more than one unit. The ISD has 4 units namely ‘A’, ‘B’, ‘C’ and ‘D’ which are operational in the current year.

Unit

Turnover in the previous year (In Rs.)
A (Manufacturing excisable goods)
25,00,000
B (Manufacturing excisable and exempted goods)
30,00,000
C (providing exclusively exempted service)
15,00,000
D (providing taxable and exempted service)
30,00,000
Total
1,00,00,000

The common input service relates to units ‘A’, ‘B’ and ‘C’, the distribution will be as under:

(i)   Distribution to ‘A’ = 12000 * 2500000/10000000 = 3000
(ii)  Distribution to ‘B’ = 12000 * 3000000/10000000 = 3600
(iii) Distribution to ‘C’ = 12000 * 1500000/10000000 = 1800
(iv) Distribution to ‘D’ = 12000 * 3000000/10000000 = 3600

The distribution for the purpose of rule 7(d), will be done in this ratio in all cases, irrespective of whether such common input services were used in all the units or in some of the units.

5. Reference may be made to Sh. G. D. Lohani, Director (TRU) in case of any further doubt. Trade Notice/Public Notice may be issued to the field formations and tax payers. Please acknowledge receipt of this Circular.

6. Hindi version to follow.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...