An Informative Platform for Chartered Accountants(CA) and CA Students.

Just enter Your Email Address and get Updates directly to Your Inbox and Kindly Click the Email Subscription Confirmation Link sent in Your Mail.
Showing posts with label MCA Circulars. Show all posts
Showing posts with label MCA Circulars. Show all posts

Company Law Settlement Scheme, 2014

Thursday, August 21, 2014 Posted by Unknown , , No comments
General Circular No. 34/2014, F. No. 02/13/2014 CL-V, dated 12th August, 2014

As you are aware, the Companies Act requires companies to file annual documents (Annual return and financial Statements) on the MCA21 electronic registry, within prescribed time limits. Sections 92, 137 and 403 of the Companies Act, 2013, which correspond to sections 159, 220 and 611 of the Companies Act, 1956 may be referred to in this regard. These annual documents are considered very important in context of an up-to-date Registry, it is observed that a large percentage of companies have not filed their statutory documents making them liable for penalties and prosecution for such non-compliance.

2. The Companies Act, 2013 lays down a stricter regime for the defaulting companies with higher additional fees. The quantum of punishment has been enhanced under the above mentioned provisions of the Act vis-a-vis the earlier Act i.e. Companies Act, 1956. A specific provision for enhanced fine in case of repeated default also been included in the form of section 451 of the Act. Additionally, the provisions section 164(2) of the Act, inter alia, providing for disqualification of directors in case a company has not filed financial statements or annual returns for any continuous period of three financial years has been extended to all companies.

3. The Ministry has received representations from various stakeholders requesting for grant of transitional period/one-time opportunity to enable them to file their pending annual documents to avoid attraction of higher fees/fine and other penal action, especially disqualification of their Director prescribed under the new provisions of the Act.

4.  in order to give such an opportunity to the defaulting companies to enable them to make their default good by filing these belated documents, the Central Government in exercise of powers conferred under section 403 and 460 of the Companies Act, 2013 has decided to introduce a Scheme namely “Company Law Settlement Scheme 2014″ [CLSS-2014] condoning the delay in filing the above mentioned documents with the Registrar, granting immunity for prosecution and charging a reduced additional fee of 25% of the actual additional fees payable as per section 403 read with Companies (Registration Offices and Fee) Rules, 2014 for filing those belated documents under the Companies Act, 1956/2013 and the Rules made thereunder.

5.  In addition, the scheme gives an opportunity to Inactive companies to get their companies declared as ‘dormant company’ under section 455 of the Act (Chapter XXIX) by filing a simple application at reduced fees. The said provision enables Inactive companies to remain on the Register of Companies with minimal compliance requirements.

6. The details of the Scheme are as under:-

(i) The scheme shall come into force on the 15th August 2014 and shall remain in force up to 15th October, 2014.

(ii) Definitions –  In this Scheme, unless the context otherwise requires,

(a) “Act” means the Companies Act, 2013 and Companies Act, 1956 (where ever applicable);

(b) “Company” means a company as defined in clause of 20 of section 2 of the  Companies Act, 2013 ;

(c) “defaulting company” means a company defined under the Companies Act, 2013, and which has made a default in filing of annual statutory documents.

(d) “designated authority” means the Registrar of Companies having jurisdiction  over the registered office of the company.

(e) “immunity certificate” means the certificate referred to in sub-paragraph (vi) of the Scheme;

(f) “inactive Company” means as defined In Explanation (i) to sub-section (1) of  section 455(1) of Companies Act, 2013.

(iii) Applicability: - Any “defaulting company” Is permitted to file belated documents which were due for filing till 30th June 2014 In accordance with the provisions of this Scheme:

(iv)  Manner of payment of fees and additional fee on filing belated document for  seeking Immunity under the Scheme - The defaulting company shall pay statutory filing fees as prescribed under the Companies (Registration Offices and fee) Rules, 2014 along with additional fees of 25% of the actual additional fee payable on the date of filing of each belated document.

(v)  Withdrawal of appeal against prosecution launched for the offences: If the defaulting company has filed any appeal against any notice Issued or complaint filed before the competent court for violation of the provisions under the Companies Act,  1956  and/or Companies Act,  2013  in  respect of which application is made under this scheme, the applicant shall before filing an application for issue of Immunity certificate, withdraw the appeal and furnish proof of such withdrawal along with the application.

(vi)  Application for Issue of Immunity in respect of document(s) filed under the Scheme -  The application for seeking immunity in respect of belated documents filed under the Scheme may be made electronically in the e-Form CLSS-2014 annexed, after the document(s) are taken on file, or on record at approved by the Registrar of Companies as the case may be. The e-Form for filing application to obtain such a certificate will be available on the MCA21 portal from 1st September, 2014 and may be filed thereafter but not later than three months from the date of closure of the Scheme. There shall not be any fee payable on this Form.

Provided that this immunity shall not be applicable in the matter of any  appeal pending before the court of law and in case of management disputes of the company pending before the court of law or tribunal.

(vii)  Order by designated authority granting immunity from penalty and prosecution - The designated authority shall consider the application and upon being satisfied shall grant the immunity certificate in respect of documents filed under this Scheme.

(viii)  Scheme not to apply in certain cases – (a) This scheme shall not apply to the filing of belated documents other than the following:

a. Form 20B -  Form for filing annual return by a company having share capital.

b. Form 21A - Particulars of Annual return for the company not having share capital.

c. Form 23AC, 23ACA, 23AC-XBRL and 23ACA-XBRL -   Forms for filing Balance Sheet and Profit & Loss account.

d. Form 66 – Form for submission of Compliance Certificate with the Registrar.

e.  Form 238 -  Form for Intimation for Appointment of Auditors.

(ix) This Scheme shall not apply

a. to companies against which action for striking off the name under sub- section (5) of section 560 of Companies Act, 1956 has already been initiated  by the Registrar of Companies or

b. where any application has already been filed by the companies for action of  striking off name from the Register of Companies or

c.  where applications have been filed for obtaining Dormant Status under  section 455 of the Companies Act, 2013;

d. to vanishing companies

(x)  After granting the immunity, the Registrar concerned shall withdraw the prosecution(s) pending if any before the concerned Court(s);

(xi) Scheme for Inactive Companies: The defaulting inactive companies, while filing due documents under CLSS-2014 can, simultaneously, either:

a. apply to get themselves declared as Dormant Company under section 455 of  the Companies Act, 2013 by filing e-form MSC-1 at 25% of the fee for the  said form; OR

b. apply for striking off the name of the company by filing e- Form FTE at 25% of the fee payable on form FTE.

(xii)  Applicability of clause (a) sub-section (2) of Companies Act, 2013 In case of companies availing the Scheme:- In case of defaulting companies which avail of this Scheme and file all belated documents, the provisions of clause (a) of subsection (2) of section 164 of the Companies Act, 2013 shall apply only for the prospective defaults, if any, by such companies.

7.  At the conclusion of the Scheme, the Registrar shall take necessary action under the Companies Act, 1956/ 2013 against the companies who have not availed this Scheme and are in default in filing these documents in a timely manner.
.
.
.

MCA Clarification w.r.t applicability of provisions of Section 139(5) and 139(7) of the Companies Act, 2013

General Circular No. 33/2014, F. No.1/33/13-CL-V, dated 3lst July, 2014

Clarification with regard to applicability of provisions of Section 139(5) and 139(7) of the Companies Act, 2013

Doubts have been raised about applicability of Sections 139(5) and 139(7) of the Companies Act, 2013 (New Act), which deal with appointment of auditors by Comptroller and Auditor General of India (C&AG), to 'deemed Government Companies' referred to in section 619B of the Companies Act 1956 (Old Act) i.e. companies where ownership or control lies with two or more Government companies or corporations etc in the manner detailed in section 619B ibid, Stakeholders have pointed out that the New Act does not contain specific provisions about 'deemed Government companies' on the lines of section 619B of the Old Act. Clarification has been sought whether, under the new Act, such deemed Government companies would be subject to audit by the C&AG in the same manner as Government Companies.

2. The above issue has been examined and it is clarified that the new Act does not alter the position with regard to audit of such deemed Government companies through C&AG and thus such companies are covered under sub- section (5) and (7) of Section 139 of the New Act.

3. Further, it has also been observed that the words “any other company owned or controlled, directly or indirectly .......... by the Central Government and partly by one or more State Governments” appearing in sub-sections (5) and (7) of section 139 of the New Act are to be read with the definition of ‘control’ in section 2(27) of the New Act. Thus documents like articles of association and shareholders agreements etc envisaging control under section 2(27) are to be taken into account while deciding whether an individual company, other than those referred in paragraph 1-2 above, is covered under section 139(5)/139(7) of the New Act.

4. Clarification has also been sought about the manner in which the information about incorporation of a company subject to audit by an auditor to be appointed by the C&AG is to be communicated to the C&AG for the purpose of appointment of first auditors under section 139(7) of the New Act. It is hereby clarified that such responsibility rests with both, the Government concerned and the relevant company. To avoid any confusion it is further clarified that it will primarily be the responsibility of the company concerned to intimate to the C&AG about its incorporation along with name, location of registered office, capital structure of such a company immediately on its incorporation, It is also incumbent on such a company to share such intimation to the relevant Government so that such Government may also send a suitable request to the C&AG.

5. This issues with the approval of the competent authority.
.
.
.

MCA Clarification on transitional period for resolutions passed under the Companies Act, 1956

General Circular No. 32/2014, No.1/25/ 13-CL-V, dated 23rd July, 2014.

Clarification on transitional period for resolutions passed under the Companies Act, 1956

It has been brought to the notice of the Government that many companies have passed resolutions during financial year 2013-14 under the relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 (Old Act) which are/were at different stages of implementation after coming into force of corresponding provisions of the new Companies Act, 2013 (New Act). Ministry has received suggestions that while section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 protects the validity of such resolutions, it will be advisable if a suitable communication is also issued in the matter by the Ministry by way of abundant caution.

2. The matter has been examined in the light of similar issues clarified earlier. It is clarified that resolutions approved or passed by companies under relevant applicable provisions of the Old Act during the period from 1st September, 2013 to 31st March, 2014, can be implemented, in accordance with provisions of the Old Act, notwithstanding the repeal of the relevant provision subject to the conditions (a) that the implementation of the resolution actually commenced before 1st April, 2014 and (b) that this transitional arrangement will be available upto expiry of one year from the passing of the resolution or six months from the commencement of the corresponding provision in New Act whichever is later. It is also clarified that any amendment of the resolution must be in accordance with the relevant provision of the New Act.

This issues with the approval of the competent authority.
.
.
.

MCA – Regarding Extension of validity of Reserved Names

Tuesday, August 05, 2014 Posted by Unknown , , No comments
General Circular No. 31/2014, F. No. MCA21/152/2014-eGov Cell, dated 19th July, 2014

Extension of validity of reserved names – reg.

The Service Provider of MCA-21 has brought to the notice of the Ministry that the letters of intimation issued in respect of 9522 cases for reservation of names (INC-1) allow the applicants to use reserved names within 60 days of date of such intimation. This is at variance with the implementation in the MCA-21. This is causing inconvenience to the stakeholders.

In view of this, the validity of 1930 of the above mentioned 9522 cases for reservations of names which have expired as on the date of this circular is hereby extended upto 18th August, 2014. Further, in case of 6864 cases where names have been reserved and are yet to be used, the time period as indicated in the letters of intimations is allowed. All applicants may accordingly be advised to file relevant e-forms for incorporation of companies under the Companies Act, 2013 well before the validity period.

This issues with the approval of the competent authority.
.
.
.

MCA Clarifications on matters relating to Related Party Transactions

General Circular No, 30/2014, No. 1/32/2013- CL-V (Pt), dated l7th July, 2014

Clarifications on matters relating to Related Party Transactions

Government has received representations from stakeholders seeking certain clarifications on related party transactions covered under section 188 of the Companies Act, 2013. These representations have been examined and the following clarifications are given:-

1. Scope of second proviso to Section 188(1):-

Second proviso to sub-section (1) of section 188 requires that no member of the company shall vote on a special resolution to approve the contract or arrangement (referred to in the first proviso), if such a member is a related patty. It is clarified that 'related party' referred to in the second proviso has to be construed with reference only to the contract or arrangement for which the said special resolution is being passed. Thus, the term 'related party' in the above context refers only to such related party as may be a related party in the context of the contract or arrangement for which the said special resolution is being passed.

2. Applicability of Section 188 to corporate restructuring- amalgamations etc.  : -

It is clarified that transactions arising out of Compromises, Arrangements and Amalgamations dealt with under specific provisions of the Companies Act, 1956/Companies Act, 2013, will not attract the requirements of section 188 of the Companies Act, 2013.

3. Requirement of fresh approvals for past contracts under Section 188. :-

Contracts entered into by companies, after making necessary compliances under Section 297 of the Companies Act, 1956, which already came into effect before the commencement of Section 188 of the Companies Act, 2013, will not require fresh approval under the said section 188 till the expiry of the original term of such contracts. Thus, if any modification in such contract is made on or after 1st April, 2014, the requirements under section 188 will have to be complied with.

4. This issues with approval of the competent authority.
.
.
.

Registration of names of the Companies shall be in consonance with.....

Friday, July 18, 2014 Posted by Unknown , , No comments
General Circular No.29/2014, File No.2/2/2014-CL-V, dated 11th July, 2014

Registration of names of the Companies shall be in consonance with the provisions of the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950 -reg.

In continuation of this Ministry's circular No. 02/2014 and 26/2014 dated 11.02.2014 and 27.06.2014 respectively, it is hereby directed that while allotting names to Companies/Limited Liability Partnerships, the Registrar of Companies concerned should exercise due care to ensure that the names are not in contravention of the provisions of the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950. To this end it is necessary that Registrars are fully familiar with the provisions of the said Act.

2. This issues with the approval of the competent authority.
.
.
.

MCA Clarification on Form MGT-14 through STP Mode

General Circular 28/2014, File No.1/9/2013- CL-V, dated 09th July, 2014

Clarification on Form MGT-14 through STP Mode

In order to simplify procedures and with a view to ensure timely disposal of E-Forms in the office of Registrars of Companies and keeping in view the penal provisions for false declaration as contained in Section 448 read with Section 447, the following E-Forms with the conditions mentioned along with will be processed and taken on record using the Straight Through Process (STP) mode.

S.No.
E-Form
Conditions
1
MGT-14
All cases except for change of Name, change of object, resolution for further issue of capital and conversion of companies will be STP Mode.

This circular will be effective from 21.07.2014.
.
.
.
.

MCA Clarification regarding filing of Form DPT4 under Companies Act, 2013

Filing of DPT4: It has been decided to grant extension of time for the period of 2 months i.e. up to 31-08-2014 without any additional fee in terms of section 403 of the Act to enable the companies for filing of statement under Form DPT4 with the Registrar.

MCA Circular:-

General Circular No. 27/2014, F. No. MCA21/123/2014/e-Gov. Cell, dated 30th June, 2014

Clarification regarding filing of Form DPT4 under Companies Act, 2013

This Ministry has received reference regarding filing of Form DPT4 under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013. As per Section 74(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013 and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 2014 made there under, companies are required to file a statement regarding deposits existing as on date of commencement of the Act within a period of 3 months from such commencement. The time for filing of said statement is expiring on 30-06-2014.

2. After considering the reference, it has been decided to grant extension of time for the period of 2 months i.e. up to 31-08-2014 without any additional fee in terms of Section 403 of the Act to enable the companies for filing of statement under Form DPT4 with the Registrar.
.
.
.

MCA Clarification regarding use of the words “Commodity Exchange” in a Company

General Circular No: 26/2014, No. 2/2/2014-CL-V, dated 27th June, 2014

Clarification with regard to use of the words “Commodity Exchange” in a Company-reg.

In continuation of this Ministry’s circular no. 02/2014 dated 11.02.2014, it is hereby clarified the use of the word “Commodity Exchange” may be allowed only where a “No Objection Certificate” from the Forward Markets Commission (FMC) is furnished by the applicant. All other provisions of the Companies (Incorporation) Rules, 2014 will continue to be applicable.

2.  It is also clarified that the certificate from Forward Markets Commission will also be required in cases of companies registered with the words “Commodity Exchange before the issue of this circular.

3. This issues with the approval of competent authority.
.
.
.
.

MCA Clarification on Applicability of requirement for Resident Director

General Circular No. 25/2014, No. 1/22/13-CL-V, dated 26th June, 2014

Clarification on Applicability of requirement for Resident Director

Section 149(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 (Act) requires every company to have at least one director who has stayed in India for a total period of not less than 182 days in the previous calendar year. Government has received requests from stakeholders for clarification with regard to applicability of these provisions in the current calendar/financial year.

2. The matter has been examined. It is clarified that the ‘residency requirement’ would be reckoned from the date of commencement of Section 149 of the Act i.e. 1st April, 2014. The first ‘previous calendar year’ for compliance with these provisions would, therefore, be Calendar Year 2014. The period to be taken into account for compliance with these provisions will be the remaining period of calendar year 2014 (i.e. 1st April to 31st December). Therefore, on a proportionate basis, the number of days for which the director(s) would need to be resident in India, during Calendar Year 2014, shall exceed 136 days.

3. Regarding newly incorporated companies it is clarified that companies incorporated between 1.4.2014 to 30.9.2O14 should have a resident director either at the incorporation stage itself or within six months of their incorporation. Companies incorporated after 30.9.2014 need to have the resident director from the date of incorporation itself.

This issues with the approval of the competent authority.
.
.
.
.

MCA Clarification w.r.t holding of Shares in a fiduciary capacity by Associate Company

General Circular no. 24/2014, F. No: 01/13/2013 -CL-V, dated 25th June, 2014

Clarification with regard to holding of shares in a fiduciary capacity by associate company under Section 2(6) of the Companies Act, 2013

In continuation of the General circular No. 20/2013 dated 27/12/2013, it is clarified that the shares held by a company in another company in a 'fiduciary capacity' shall not be counted for the purpose of determining the relationship of 'associate company' under section 2(6) of the Companies Act, 2013.

2. This issues with approval of Competent Authority.
.
.
.
.
.

MCA Clarification relating to Incorporation of a Company i.e. Company Incorporated outside India

General Circular No. 23/2014, F. N: 1/ 13/2013 -CL-V, dated 25th June, 2014

Clarification relating to Incorporation of a Company i.e. Company Incorporated outside India

Government has received references seeking clarity about the status of subsidiaries incorporated/to be incorporated by companies incorporated outside India. Attention has, in particular, been drawn to the absence of the deeming provision of Sub-Section (7) of Section 4 of the Companies Act, 1956 in the Companies Act, 2013 (New Act).

The matter has been examined in the Ministry in the light of Sections 2(68), 2(71) and 2(87) of the New Act and it is clarified that there is no bar in the new Act for a company incorporated outside India to incorporate a subsidiary either as a public company or a private company. An existing company, being a subsidiary of a company incorporated outside India, registered under the Companies Act, 1956, either as private company or a public company by virtue of Section 4(7) of that Act, will continue as a private company or public company, as the case may be, without any change in the incorporation status of such company.

3. This issues with approval of Competent Authority.
.
.
.
.

MCA Clarification w.r.t Format of Annual Return applicable for FY 2013-14 and Fees to be charged by Companies for allowing Inspection of Records

General Circular No. 22/2014, No. 1/ 34 /2013-CL-V (Part-I), dated 25th June, 2014

Clarification with regard to Format of Annual Return applicable for Financial Year 2013-14 and Fees to be charged by Companies for allowing Inspection of Records

Government has received requests for clarification about the applicability of form of annual return (MGT-7) prescribed under rule 11(1) of the Companies (Management and Administration) Rules, 2014 for financial year(s) commencing earlier than 16th April, 2014. The matter has been examined in the light of provisions of Section 92(1) of the Act which requires annual return to contain particulars as they stood on the close of the financial year. It is, clarified that Form MGT-7 shall not apply to annual returns in respect of companies whose financial year ended on or before 1st April, 2014 and for annual returns pertaining to earlier years. These companies may file their returns in the relevant Form applicable under the Companies Act, 1956.

2. Companies have also sought clarity about permitting free of cost inspection of records under rule 14(2) and rule 16 of the rules cited above and till a fee is prescribed for the purpose in the Articles. It is clarified that until the requisite fee is specified by companies, inspections could be allowed without levy of fee.

3. This issues with the approval of the competent authority.
.
.
.
.

MCA Clarification with regard to provisions of Corporate Social Responsibility

General Circular No. 21/2014, No. 05/01/2014- CSR, dated 18th June, 2014

Clarifications with regard to provisions of Corporate Social Responsibility under Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013

This Ministry has received several references and representation from stakeholders seeking clarifications on the provisions under Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013 (herein after referred as ‘the Act’) and the Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility Policy) Rules, 2014, as well as activities to be undertaken as per Schedule VII of the Companies Act, 2013. Clarifications with respect to representations received in the Ministry on Corporate Social Responsibility (herein after referred as (‘CSR’) are as under:-

(i) The statutory provision and provisions of CSR Rules, 2014, is to ensure that while activities undertaken in pursuance of the CSR policy must be relatable to Schedule VII of the Companies Act 2013, the entries in the said Schedule VII must be interpreted liberally so as to capture the essence of the subjects enumerated in the said Schedule. The items enlisted in the amended Schedule VII of the Act, are broad-based and are intended to cover a wide range of activities as illustratively mentioned in the Annexure.

(ii) It is further clarified that CSR activities should be undertaken by the companies in project/ programme mode [as referred in Rule 4 (1) of Companies CSR Rules, 2014]. One-off events such as marathons/ awards/ charitable contribution/ advertisement/ sponsorships of TV programmes etc. would not be qualified as part of CSR expenditure.

(iii) Expenses incurred by companies for the fulfillment of any Act/ Statute of regulations (such as Labour Laws, Land Acquisition Act etc.) would not count as CSR expenditure under the Companies Act.

(iv) Salaries paid by the companies to regular CSR staff as well as to volunteers of the companies (in proportion to company’s time/hours spent specifically on CSR) can be factored into CSR project cost as part of the CSR expenditure.

(v) “Any financial year” referred under Sub-Section (1) of Section 135 of the Act read with Rule 3(2) of Companies CSR Rule, 2014, implies ‘any of the three preceding financial years’.

(vi) Expenditure incurred by Foreign Holding Company for CSR activities in India will qualify as CSR spend of the Indian subsidiary if, the CSR expenditures are routed through Indian subsidiaries and if the Indian subsidiary is required to do so as per section 135 of the Act.

(vii) ‘Registered Trust’ (as referred in Rule 4(2) of the Companies CSR Rules, 2014) would include Trusts registered under Income Tax Act 1956, for those States where registration of Trust is not mandatory.

(viii) Contribution to Corpus of a Trust/ society/ section 8 companies etc. will qualify as CSR expenditure as long as (a) the Trust/ society/ section 8 companies etc. is created exclusively for undertaking CSR activities or (b) where the corpus is created exclusively for a purpose directly relatable to a subject covered in Schedule VII of the Act.

2. This issues with the approval of Competent Authority.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

MCA Circular - Clarification with regard to voting through Electronic Means

General Circular No. 20/2014, No. 1/34/2013-CL-V, dated 17th June, 2014

Clarification with regard to voting through Electronic Means - Reg.

Section 108 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with rule 20 of the Companies (Management and Administration) Rules, 2014 deal with the exercise of right to vote by members by electronic means (e-means), The provisions seek to ensure wider shareholders participation in the decision making process in companies. Corporates and other stakeholders while appreciating the new approach have drawn attention to some practical difficulties in respect of general meetings to be held in the next few months.

2. "The suggestions received from the stakeholders have been examined. It is noticed that compliance with procedural requirements, engagement of Depository Agencies and the need for clarity on matter like demand for poll/postal ballot etc will take some more time. Accordingly, it has been decided not to treat the relevant provisions as mandatory till 31st December, 2014. "The relevant notification in this regard is being issued separately.

3. To provide clarity and ensure uniformity in the e-voting procedure, clarifications on certain issues raised by the stakeholders are provided in the Annexure to this circular for guidance of all concerned.

This issues with the approval of the competent authority.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Clarifications - Share Capital and Debentures- reg.

Clarifications on Rules prescribed under the Companies Act, 2013 - Matters relating to share capital and debentures- reg.

General Circular No. 19/2014, No.  1/4/2013-CL-V, dated 12th June, 2014

Government has received representations from Industry Chambers, Professional Institutes and other stakeholders seeking clarifications on matters relating to ‘share capital and debentures’ under the relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 (Act) read with relevant rules, which have come into force with effect from 1st April, 2014. The representations have been examined and clarifications on the following points are hereby given:-

(i) Share  Transfer  Forms  executed  before 1st  April, 2014:-

In view of prescription of new Securities Transfer Form as per Form SH-4 with effect from 1st April, 2014, the companies and other stakeholders have sought clarity with regard to Share Transfer Forms executed before 1st April, 2014 as per earlier Form 7B but which are yet to be accepted/ registered by companies.

The matter has been examined and it is clarified that since transaction relating to transfer of shares is a contract between two or more persons/ shareholders, any share transfer form executed before 1st April, 2014 and submitted to the company concerned within the period prescribed under relevant section of the Companies Act, 1956 needs to be accepted by the companies for registration of transfers. In case any such share transfer form, executed prior to 1st April, 2014, is not submitted within the prescribed period under the Companies Act, 1956, the concerned company may get itself satisfied suitably with regard to justification of delay in submission etc. In case a company decides not to accept the share transfer form, it shall convey the reasons for such non-acceptance within time provided under section 56(4)(c) of the Act.

(ii) Delegation of powers by board under rule 6(2)(a):  

Clarification has been sought whether  the  powers  of the Board provided under rule 6(2) (a) of Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules, 2014 with regard to issue of duplicate share certificates can be exercised by a Committee of Directors.

The matter has been examined in light of the relevant provisions of the Act, particularly sections 179 & 180 and regulation 71 of Table "F" of Schedule I and it is clarified that a committee of directors may exercise such powers, subject to any regulations imposed by the Board in this regard.

This issues with the approval of the competent authority.
.
.
.
.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...