An Informative Platform for Chartered Accountants(CA) and CA Students.

Just enter Your Email Address and get Updates directly to Your Inbox and Kindly Click the Email Subscription Confirmation Link sent in Your Mail.
Showing posts with label Clarifications. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Clarifications. Show all posts

MCA Clarification w.r.t applicability of provisions of Section 139(5) and 139(7) of the Companies Act, 2013

General Circular No. 33/2014, F. No.1/33/13-CL-V, dated 3lst July, 2014

Clarification with regard to applicability of provisions of Section 139(5) and 139(7) of the Companies Act, 2013

Doubts have been raised about applicability of Sections 139(5) and 139(7) of the Companies Act, 2013 (New Act), which deal with appointment of auditors by Comptroller and Auditor General of India (C&AG), to 'deemed Government Companies' referred to in section 619B of the Companies Act 1956 (Old Act) i.e. companies where ownership or control lies with two or more Government companies or corporations etc in the manner detailed in section 619B ibid, Stakeholders have pointed out that the New Act does not contain specific provisions about 'deemed Government companies' on the lines of section 619B of the Old Act. Clarification has been sought whether, under the new Act, such deemed Government companies would be subject to audit by the C&AG in the same manner as Government Companies.

2. The above issue has been examined and it is clarified that the new Act does not alter the position with regard to audit of such deemed Government companies through C&AG and thus such companies are covered under sub- section (5) and (7) of Section 139 of the New Act.

3. Further, it has also been observed that the words “any other company owned or controlled, directly or indirectly .......... by the Central Government and partly by one or more State Governments” appearing in sub-sections (5) and (7) of section 139 of the New Act are to be read with the definition of ‘control’ in section 2(27) of the New Act. Thus documents like articles of association and shareholders agreements etc envisaging control under section 2(27) are to be taken into account while deciding whether an individual company, other than those referred in paragraph 1-2 above, is covered under section 139(5)/139(7) of the New Act.

4. Clarification has also been sought about the manner in which the information about incorporation of a company subject to audit by an auditor to be appointed by the C&AG is to be communicated to the C&AG for the purpose of appointment of first auditors under section 139(7) of the New Act. It is hereby clarified that such responsibility rests with both, the Government concerned and the relevant company. To avoid any confusion it is further clarified that it will primarily be the responsibility of the company concerned to intimate to the C&AG about its incorporation along with name, location of registered office, capital structure of such a company immediately on its incorporation, It is also incumbent on such a company to share such intimation to the relevant Government so that such Government may also send a suitable request to the C&AG.

5. This issues with the approval of the competent authority.
.
.
.

Clarification regarding taxation of ‘Alternate Investment Funds’ having status of Non-Charitable Trusts

Friday, August 08, 2014 Posted by Unknown , , , No comments
Circular No. 13/2014, F.No.225/78/2014-ITA.II, dated 28th July, 2014

Clarification regarding taxation of ‘Alternate Investment Funds’ having status of Non-Charitable Trusts under the Income Tax Act, 1961 – regarding.

1. The SEBI (Alterative Investment Funds) Regulations, 2012 (‘AIF Regulations’) vide Regulation No.4 issued in May 2012 aims at regulating all forms of private pool of funds in India. The said Regulations divide the Alternative Investment Funds (‘AIFs’) into three broad categories – Category-I, Category-II and Category-III Alternative Investment Funds, depending upon the operational strategies, objectives and fund structure. A large number of AIFs registered with SEBI have been set up in the form of non-charitable trusts.

2. While the AIFs, being Venture Capital Funds, making investment in the Venture ‘Capital Undertakings have been accorded ‘tax pass through’ status under section 10(23FB) read with section 115U of the Income tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’) (whereby income arising in the hands of such Fund would be treated as tax-exempt, while investors of such funds would become liable to tax liability on as if the investors have made the investments directly in the Venture Capital Undertaking), clarification has been sought about tax-treatment in cases of AIFs being non-charitable trusts where the investors name and beneficial interest are not explicitly known on the date of its creation – such information becoming available only when the funds starts accepting contributions from the investors.

3. Board has been requested to clarify whether the income of such funds would be taxable in the hands of the Trustees of the AIF in the capacity of a ‘Representative Assessee’ (as defined u/s- 160(i)(iv) of the Act) or in the hands of investors (i.e. contributors of funds).

4. The matter has been examined. In the situation where the trust deed either does not name the investors or does not specify their beneficial interests, provisions of sub-section (1) of section 164 would) come into play and the entire income of the Fund shall become liable to be taxed at the Maximum Marginal Rate of income-tax in the hands of the trustees of such AIFs in their capacity as ‘Representative Assessee’. It is also clarified that in such cases, provisions of section 166 of the Act need not be invoked in the hands of the investor, as corresponding income has already been taxed in the hands of the ‘Representative Assessee’ in accordance with sub-section (1) of section 164 of the Act.

5. However, in cases of funds where names of the beneficiaries and their interests in the Fund are determined i.e. stated in the trust deed, the tax on whole of the income of the Fund – consisting of or including profits and gains of business, would be leviable upon the Trustees of such AIF, being ‘Representative Assessee’ at the Maximum Marginal Rate in accordance with sub-section (1A) of section 161 of the Act.

6. The clarification given above shall not be operative in the area falling in the jurisdiction of a High Court which has taken or takes a contrary decision on the issue.

7. The contents of this Circular may be brought to the notice of all concerned.

8. Hindi version to follow.

Clarification on position limits of domestic institutional investors for currency derivatives contracts

Circular, CIR/MRD/DP/23/2014, dated 24th July, 2014

Clarification on position limits of domestic institutional investors for currency derivatives contracts

SEBI vide circular no. CIR/MRD/DP/20/2014 dated June 20, 2014 had revised position limits for the market participants in the permitted currency pairs.

2. In this regard, it is clarified that domestic institutional investors shall have position limits as mentioned at para 12.(a) of the SEBI circular CIR/MRD/DP/20/2014 dated June 20, 2014, subject to such domestic institutional investors being permitted by their respective sectoral regulators to participate in the currency derivatives segment.

3. It is further clarified that banks, whether participating in the currency derivatives segment as clients or as stock brokers, shall be guided by the provisions mentioned at para 3 of the RBI A.P. (DIR Series) Circular no. 147 dated June 20, 2014 while trading in the currency derivatives segment.

4. Stock Exchanges and Clearing Corporations are directed to:

(a) take necessary steps to put in place systems for implementation of the circular, including necessary amendments to the relevant bye-laws, rules and regulations.

(b) bring the provisions of this circular to the notice of the stock brokers / clearing members and also disseminate the same on their website;

(c) communicate to SEBI the status of implementation of the provisions of this circular.

5. This circular is being issued in exercise of powers conferred under Section 11 (1) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 to protect the interests of investors in securities and to promote the development of, and to regulate the securities market.
.
.
.

MCA Clarification on transitional period for resolutions passed under the Companies Act, 1956

General Circular No. 32/2014, No.1/25/ 13-CL-V, dated 23rd July, 2014.

Clarification on transitional period for resolutions passed under the Companies Act, 1956

It has been brought to the notice of the Government that many companies have passed resolutions during financial year 2013-14 under the relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 (Old Act) which are/were at different stages of implementation after coming into force of corresponding provisions of the new Companies Act, 2013 (New Act). Ministry has received suggestions that while section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 protects the validity of such resolutions, it will be advisable if a suitable communication is also issued in the matter by the Ministry by way of abundant caution.

2. The matter has been examined in the light of similar issues clarified earlier. It is clarified that resolutions approved or passed by companies under relevant applicable provisions of the Old Act during the period from 1st September, 2013 to 31st March, 2014, can be implemented, in accordance with provisions of the Old Act, notwithstanding the repeal of the relevant provision subject to the conditions (a) that the implementation of the resolution actually commenced before 1st April, 2014 and (b) that this transitional arrangement will be available upto expiry of one year from the passing of the resolution or six months from the commencement of the corresponding provision in New Act whichever is later. It is also clarified that any amendment of the resolution must be in accordance with the relevant provision of the New Act.

This issues with the approval of the competent authority.
.
.
.

Clarification and extension of deadline w.r.t circular on Guidelines on disclosures.......

Clarification and extension of deadline with respect to circular on Guidelines on disclosures, reporting and clarifications under AIF Regulations

Circular, CIR/IMD/DF/16/2014, dated July 18, 2014

All Alternative Investment Funds ("AIFs") registered with SEBI

SEBI had issued a circular No. CIR/IMD/DF/14/2014 dated June 19, 2014 on 'Guidelines on disclosures, reporting and clarifications under AIF Regulations'. In this regard, it is clarified as under:

1. The deadline for sending of annexure to the placement memorandum to the investors under clause 2(a)(iii) is extended till August 31, 2014.

2. With respect to disclosure of disciplinary history under clause 2(a)(ii), the same shall be applicable for the last 5 years and where monetary penalty is involved, in cases where such penalty is greater than Rs. 5 lakhs. With respect to disputed tax liabilities, the same shall not apply to liabilities in personal capacity of an individual. Contingent liabilities shall be as disclosed in books of accounts of the entity.

3. With respect to clause 2(b)(iii), the changes shall include modifications in terms or documents of the fund/scheme and the same may be intimated to investors and SEBI once every six months on a consolidated basis. With respect to clause 2(b)(iv), 'material' changes may be construed as changes in the fundamental attributes of the fund/scheme and the process for exit under the clause shall not apply in cases where the AIF has approval of not less than 75% of unit holders by value of their investment in the AIF with respect to sub-clauses (a) and (b).

4. With respect to clause 3(d), joint investors shall mean where each of the investor contributes towards the AIF. With respect to clause 3(g), such investee company shall hold or propose to hold not less than one project, directly or indirectly.
.
.
.

MCA Clarifications on matters relating to Related Party Transactions

General Circular No, 30/2014, No. 1/32/2013- CL-V (Pt), dated l7th July, 2014

Clarifications on matters relating to Related Party Transactions

Government has received representations from stakeholders seeking certain clarifications on related party transactions covered under section 188 of the Companies Act, 2013. These representations have been examined and the following clarifications are given:-

1. Scope of second proviso to Section 188(1):-

Second proviso to sub-section (1) of section 188 requires that no member of the company shall vote on a special resolution to approve the contract or arrangement (referred to in the first proviso), if such a member is a related patty. It is clarified that 'related party' referred to in the second proviso has to be construed with reference only to the contract or arrangement for which the said special resolution is being passed. Thus, the term 'related party' in the above context refers only to such related party as may be a related party in the context of the contract or arrangement for which the said special resolution is being passed.

2. Applicability of Section 188 to corporate restructuring- amalgamations etc.  : -

It is clarified that transactions arising out of Compromises, Arrangements and Amalgamations dealt with under specific provisions of the Companies Act, 1956/Companies Act, 2013, will not attract the requirements of section 188 of the Companies Act, 2013.

3. Requirement of fresh approvals for past contracts under Section 188. :-

Contracts entered into by companies, after making necessary compliances under Section 297 of the Companies Act, 1956, which already came into effect before the commencement of Section 188 of the Companies Act, 2013, will not require fresh approval under the said section 188 till the expiry of the original term of such contracts. Thus, if any modification in such contract is made on or after 1st April, 2014, the requirements under section 188 will have to be complied with.

4. This issues with approval of the competent authority.
.
.
.

MCA Clarification on Form MGT-14 through STP Mode

General Circular 28/2014, File No.1/9/2013- CL-V, dated 09th July, 2014

Clarification on Form MGT-14 through STP Mode

In order to simplify procedures and with a view to ensure timely disposal of E-Forms in the office of Registrars of Companies and keeping in view the penal provisions for false declaration as contained in Section 448 read with Section 447, the following E-Forms with the conditions mentioned along with will be processed and taken on record using the Straight Through Process (STP) mode.

S.No.
E-Form
Conditions
1
MGT-14
All cases except for change of Name, change of object, resolution for further issue of capital and conversion of companies will be STP Mode.

This circular will be effective from 21.07.2014.
.
.
.
.

MCA Clarification regarding filing of Form DPT4 under Companies Act, 2013

Filing of DPT4: It has been decided to grant extension of time for the period of 2 months i.e. up to 31-08-2014 without any additional fee in terms of section 403 of the Act to enable the companies for filing of statement under Form DPT4 with the Registrar.

MCA Circular:-

General Circular No. 27/2014, F. No. MCA21/123/2014/e-Gov. Cell, dated 30th June, 2014

Clarification regarding filing of Form DPT4 under Companies Act, 2013

This Ministry has received reference regarding filing of Form DPT4 under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013. As per Section 74(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013 and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 2014 made there under, companies are required to file a statement regarding deposits existing as on date of commencement of the Act within a period of 3 months from such commencement. The time for filing of said statement is expiring on 30-06-2014.

2. After considering the reference, it has been decided to grant extension of time for the period of 2 months i.e. up to 31-08-2014 without any additional fee in terms of Section 403 of the Act to enable the companies for filing of statement under Form DPT4 with the Registrar.
.
.
.

MCA Clarification regarding use of the words “Commodity Exchange” in a Company

General Circular No: 26/2014, No. 2/2/2014-CL-V, dated 27th June, 2014

Clarification with regard to use of the words “Commodity Exchange” in a Company-reg.

In continuation of this Ministry’s circular no. 02/2014 dated 11.02.2014, it is hereby clarified the use of the word “Commodity Exchange” may be allowed only where a “No Objection Certificate” from the Forward Markets Commission (FMC) is furnished by the applicant. All other provisions of the Companies (Incorporation) Rules, 2014 will continue to be applicable.

2.  It is also clarified that the certificate from Forward Markets Commission will also be required in cases of companies registered with the words “Commodity Exchange before the issue of this circular.

3. This issues with the approval of competent authority.
.
.
.
.

MCA Clarification on Applicability of requirement for Resident Director

General Circular No. 25/2014, No. 1/22/13-CL-V, dated 26th June, 2014

Clarification on Applicability of requirement for Resident Director

Section 149(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 (Act) requires every company to have at least one director who has stayed in India for a total period of not less than 182 days in the previous calendar year. Government has received requests from stakeholders for clarification with regard to applicability of these provisions in the current calendar/financial year.

2. The matter has been examined. It is clarified that the ‘residency requirement’ would be reckoned from the date of commencement of Section 149 of the Act i.e. 1st April, 2014. The first ‘previous calendar year’ for compliance with these provisions would, therefore, be Calendar Year 2014. The period to be taken into account for compliance with these provisions will be the remaining period of calendar year 2014 (i.e. 1st April to 31st December). Therefore, on a proportionate basis, the number of days for which the director(s) would need to be resident in India, during Calendar Year 2014, shall exceed 136 days.

3. Regarding newly incorporated companies it is clarified that companies incorporated between 1.4.2014 to 30.9.2O14 should have a resident director either at the incorporation stage itself or within six months of their incorporation. Companies incorporated after 30.9.2014 need to have the resident director from the date of incorporation itself.

This issues with the approval of the competent authority.
.
.
.
.

MCA Clarification w.r.t holding of Shares in a fiduciary capacity by Associate Company

General Circular no. 24/2014, F. No: 01/13/2013 -CL-V, dated 25th June, 2014

Clarification with regard to holding of shares in a fiduciary capacity by associate company under Section 2(6) of the Companies Act, 2013

In continuation of the General circular No. 20/2013 dated 27/12/2013, it is clarified that the shares held by a company in another company in a 'fiduciary capacity' shall not be counted for the purpose of determining the relationship of 'associate company' under section 2(6) of the Companies Act, 2013.

2. This issues with approval of Competent Authority.
.
.
.
.
.

MCA Clarification relating to Incorporation of a Company i.e. Company Incorporated outside India

General Circular No. 23/2014, F. N: 1/ 13/2013 -CL-V, dated 25th June, 2014

Clarification relating to Incorporation of a Company i.e. Company Incorporated outside India

Government has received references seeking clarity about the status of subsidiaries incorporated/to be incorporated by companies incorporated outside India. Attention has, in particular, been drawn to the absence of the deeming provision of Sub-Section (7) of Section 4 of the Companies Act, 1956 in the Companies Act, 2013 (New Act).

The matter has been examined in the Ministry in the light of Sections 2(68), 2(71) and 2(87) of the New Act and it is clarified that there is no bar in the new Act for a company incorporated outside India to incorporate a subsidiary either as a public company or a private company. An existing company, being a subsidiary of a company incorporated outside India, registered under the Companies Act, 1956, either as private company or a public company by virtue of Section 4(7) of that Act, will continue as a private company or public company, as the case may be, without any change in the incorporation status of such company.

3. This issues with approval of Competent Authority.
.
.
.
.

MCA Clarification w.r.t Format of Annual Return applicable for FY 2013-14 and Fees to be charged by Companies for allowing Inspection of Records

General Circular No. 22/2014, No. 1/ 34 /2013-CL-V (Part-I), dated 25th June, 2014

Clarification with regard to Format of Annual Return applicable for Financial Year 2013-14 and Fees to be charged by Companies for allowing Inspection of Records

Government has received requests for clarification about the applicability of form of annual return (MGT-7) prescribed under rule 11(1) of the Companies (Management and Administration) Rules, 2014 for financial year(s) commencing earlier than 16th April, 2014. The matter has been examined in the light of provisions of Section 92(1) of the Act which requires annual return to contain particulars as they stood on the close of the financial year. It is, clarified that Form MGT-7 shall not apply to annual returns in respect of companies whose financial year ended on or before 1st April, 2014 and for annual returns pertaining to earlier years. These companies may file their returns in the relevant Form applicable under the Companies Act, 1956.

2. Companies have also sought clarity about permitting free of cost inspection of records under rule 14(2) and rule 16 of the rules cited above and till a fee is prescribed for the purpose in the Articles. It is clarified that until the requisite fee is specified by companies, inspections could be allowed without levy of fee.

3. This issues with the approval of the competent authority.
.
.
.
.

MCA Clarification with regard to provisions of Corporate Social Responsibility

General Circular No. 21/2014, No. 05/01/2014- CSR, dated 18th June, 2014

Clarifications with regard to provisions of Corporate Social Responsibility under Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013

This Ministry has received several references and representation from stakeholders seeking clarifications on the provisions under Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013 (herein after referred as ‘the Act’) and the Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility Policy) Rules, 2014, as well as activities to be undertaken as per Schedule VII of the Companies Act, 2013. Clarifications with respect to representations received in the Ministry on Corporate Social Responsibility (herein after referred as (‘CSR’) are as under:-

(i) The statutory provision and provisions of CSR Rules, 2014, is to ensure that while activities undertaken in pursuance of the CSR policy must be relatable to Schedule VII of the Companies Act 2013, the entries in the said Schedule VII must be interpreted liberally so as to capture the essence of the subjects enumerated in the said Schedule. The items enlisted in the amended Schedule VII of the Act, are broad-based and are intended to cover a wide range of activities as illustratively mentioned in the Annexure.

(ii) It is further clarified that CSR activities should be undertaken by the companies in project/ programme mode [as referred in Rule 4 (1) of Companies CSR Rules, 2014]. One-off events such as marathons/ awards/ charitable contribution/ advertisement/ sponsorships of TV programmes etc. would not be qualified as part of CSR expenditure.

(iii) Expenses incurred by companies for the fulfillment of any Act/ Statute of regulations (such as Labour Laws, Land Acquisition Act etc.) would not count as CSR expenditure under the Companies Act.

(iv) Salaries paid by the companies to regular CSR staff as well as to volunteers of the companies (in proportion to company’s time/hours spent specifically on CSR) can be factored into CSR project cost as part of the CSR expenditure.

(v) “Any financial year” referred under Sub-Section (1) of Section 135 of the Act read with Rule 3(2) of Companies CSR Rule, 2014, implies ‘any of the three preceding financial years’.

(vi) Expenditure incurred by Foreign Holding Company for CSR activities in India will qualify as CSR spend of the Indian subsidiary if, the CSR expenditures are routed through Indian subsidiaries and if the Indian subsidiary is required to do so as per section 135 of the Act.

(vii) ‘Registered Trust’ (as referred in Rule 4(2) of the Companies CSR Rules, 2014) would include Trusts registered under Income Tax Act 1956, for those States where registration of Trust is not mandatory.

(viii) Contribution to Corpus of a Trust/ society/ section 8 companies etc. will qualify as CSR expenditure as long as (a) the Trust/ society/ section 8 companies etc. is created exclusively for undertaking CSR activities or (b) where the corpus is created exclusively for a purpose directly relatable to a subject covered in Schedule VII of the Act.

2. This issues with the approval of Competent Authority.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

MCA Circular - Clarification with regard to voting through Electronic Means

General Circular No. 20/2014, No. 1/34/2013-CL-V, dated 17th June, 2014

Clarification with regard to voting through Electronic Means - Reg.

Section 108 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with rule 20 of the Companies (Management and Administration) Rules, 2014 deal with the exercise of right to vote by members by electronic means (e-means), The provisions seek to ensure wider shareholders participation in the decision making process in companies. Corporates and other stakeholders while appreciating the new approach have drawn attention to some practical difficulties in respect of general meetings to be held in the next few months.

2. "The suggestions received from the stakeholders have been examined. It is noticed that compliance with procedural requirements, engagement of Depository Agencies and the need for clarity on matter like demand for poll/postal ballot etc will take some more time. Accordingly, it has been decided not to treat the relevant provisions as mandatory till 31st December, 2014. "The relevant notification in this regard is being issued separately.

3. To provide clarity and ensure uniformity in the e-voting procedure, clarifications on certain issues raised by the stakeholders are provided in the Annexure to this circular for guidance of all concerned.

This issues with the approval of the competent authority.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Clarifications - Share Capital and Debentures- reg.

Clarifications on Rules prescribed under the Companies Act, 2013 - Matters relating to share capital and debentures- reg.

General Circular No. 19/2014, No.  1/4/2013-CL-V, dated 12th June, 2014

Government has received representations from Industry Chambers, Professional Institutes and other stakeholders seeking clarifications on matters relating to ‘share capital and debentures’ under the relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 (Act) read with relevant rules, which have come into force with effect from 1st April, 2014. The representations have been examined and clarifications on the following points are hereby given:-

(i) Share  Transfer  Forms  executed  before 1st  April, 2014:-

In view of prescription of new Securities Transfer Form as per Form SH-4 with effect from 1st April, 2014, the companies and other stakeholders have sought clarity with regard to Share Transfer Forms executed before 1st April, 2014 as per earlier Form 7B but which are yet to be accepted/ registered by companies.

The matter has been examined and it is clarified that since transaction relating to transfer of shares is a contract between two or more persons/ shareholders, any share transfer form executed before 1st April, 2014 and submitted to the company concerned within the period prescribed under relevant section of the Companies Act, 1956 needs to be accepted by the companies for registration of transfers. In case any such share transfer form, executed prior to 1st April, 2014, is not submitted within the prescribed period under the Companies Act, 1956, the concerned company may get itself satisfied suitably with regard to justification of delay in submission etc. In case a company decides not to accept the share transfer form, it shall convey the reasons for such non-acceptance within time provided under section 56(4)(c) of the Act.

(ii) Delegation of powers by board under rule 6(2)(a):  

Clarification has been sought whether  the  powers  of the Board provided under rule 6(2) (a) of Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules, 2014 with regard to issue of duplicate share certificates can be exercised by a Committee of Directors.

The matter has been examined in light of the relevant provisions of the Act, particularly sections 179 & 180 and regulation 71 of Table "F" of Schedule I and it is clarified that a committee of directors may exercise such powers, subject to any regulations imposed by the Board in this regard.

This issues with the approval of the competent authority.
.
.
.
.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...