Press Release, dated
01-03-2013
Concern has been
expressed regarding the clause in the Finance Bill that amends Section 90 of the
Income-tax Act that deals with Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements.
Sub-section (4) of section 90 was introduced last year by Finance Act, 2012.
That subsection requires an assessee to produce a Tax Residency Certificate
(TRC) in order to claim the benefit under DTAA.
DTAAs recognize
different kinds of income. The DTAAs stipulate that a resident of a contracting
state will be entitled to the benefits of the DTAA.
In the
explanatory memorandum to the Finance Act, 2012, it was stated that the Tax
Residency Certificate containing prescribed particulars is a necessary but not
sufficient condition for availing benefits of the DTAA. The same words are
proposed to be introduced in the Income-tax Act as sub-section (5) of section
90. Hence, it will be clear that nothing new has been done this year which was
not there already last year.
However, it has
been pointed out that the language of the proposed sub-section (5) of section
90 could mean that the Tax Residency Certificate produced by a resident of a
contracting state could be questioned by the Income Tax Authorities in India.
The government wishes to make it clear that that is not the intention of the
proposed subsection (5) of section 90. The Tax Residency Certificate produced
by a resident of a contracting state will be accepted as evidence that he is a resident
of that contracting state and the Income Tax Authorities in India will not go
behind the TRC and question his resident status.
In the case of
Mauritius, circular no. 789, dated 13-4-2000 continues to be in force, pending ongoing
discussions between India and Mauritius.
However, since a
concern has been expressed about the language of sub-section (5) of section 90,
this concern will be addressed suitably when the Finance Bill is taken up for
consideration.
There are many things we need to know about tax residency and I believe it is a must to know that.
ReplyDelete